I Was Wrong About Scientology
I first wrote about Scientology in March of 2006, defending it by saying that it’s core tenets were much less harmful than other religions. After all, look at where major world religions have lead us. I was wrong to pose that argument, though I didn’t know it at the time. Brittany and Tony both made comments to this effect. While I do not now support religion, I cannot continue to go on without calling out Scientology. Scientology is a cult. It is absolutely indefensible. And if Scientologists held power like Christians do in the United States, it would be a horrible disaster.
I’m currently reading a biography of Tom Cruise, which could have been labeled as a history of Scientology, but then would not have sold as well. This book has opened my eyes to just how nefarious the group’s operations are, as well as to the ludicrous nature of their claims. Christian teachings make no sense, but they make more sense than Scientology.
A few arguments that people have offered up in support of Scientology (or against those who criticize the cult):
1. Scientology is no more ridiculous than other religions.
Not in its core beliefs, no. But in the lengths that Scientology has gone to stifle criticism, to recruit new members, to punish existing members, to seek total control over members – in these regards, and more, Scientology is much more ridiculous. Scientology also costs money, lots of money, if you want to move up their spiritual ranks. Tom Cruise had reportedly shelled out 2.5 million dollars as of 2006. Being a Christian is free.
2. Scientology is a personal belief, and thus people who practice it should be left alone.
No, Scientology is not a personal belief. It’s a cult, and is only supported by bringing in new believers constantly. If new people were to stop signing up, the organization would be threatened. And when children are being indoctrinated into this ridiculous system of beliefs, based on nothing but the writings of an insane author seeking power – something must be done. That is why entire countries have banned Scientology: it represents a clear and present threat to the world.
3. Scientology has something real to offer the world.
No, Scientology’s practices are not based in science. No research exists to back up their methods of teaching or healing. Any proof offered is either in the form of twisted evidence or unreliable personal testimonies. Those still in the program MUST state that they support it. Firstly, they would be severely punished if they did not. Secondly, because they must seek to justify their own ridiculous actions (including ending contact with their families, cessation of life-saving medications, and large donations), their statements can only be seen as necessary to keep themselves from falling into a pit of despair. Yes, members, you are wasting your lives in a CULT!
If I have caused any harm with that previous post (which seems unlikely, but possible), I sincerely apologize. I wish I had done more research when Brittany and Tony brought to my attention the shady practices of this cult. If you are a scientologist, escape while you still can. Your life may already be in danger.
Related posts (automatically generated):